Talent Screening and Assessment Software Guide
Plum vs Sova Assessment
View this side-by-side comparison of Sova Assessment vs Plum based on data from user reviews and publicly available information on Plum and Sova Assessment, to help you make the best choice for your recruitment needs.
Comparing Sova Assessment and Plum
Choosing between Sova Assessment and Plum largely depends on your specific evaluation requirements and the kind of experience you wish to offer your candidates. Sova Assessment delivers a comprehensive, scientifically-backed approach to assessing talent, providing intricate data on candidate potential. On the other hand, Plum offers a more user-friendly, holistic platform that uses AI to predict candidate success, making it more accessible to a broad range of users.
Sova Assessment is an assessment software designed to streamline the recruitment process by evaluating candidates' skills and abilities in a comprehensive manner. It is recognized for its comprehensive tests that simulate realistic scenarios, thus enabling companies to assess candidates' practical skills effectively. On the other hand, Plum is a talent assessment platform that uses predictive analysis to identify the potential of candidates. It not only assesses the technical skills but also identifies candidates' problem-solving abilities and cultural fit, making it an excellent choice for companies aiming to hire well-rounded individuals. Both software solutions offer distinctive features and are useful in their capacity to efficiently and accurately assess candidate potential during the recruitment process.
Save Time Screening for Culture Add and Culture Fit
Assessment Vendor Features
Candidate Screening
Candidate Comparisons
Candidate Ranking
Talent Development
Customizable Tests
(depends on vendor)
Dashboard Reporting
Personality Testing
Cognitive Testing
Psychometrics
Sova Assessment and Plum ease of use and candidate experience
Sova Assessment provides a streamlined user experience with its intuitive design and easy-to-use interface, ensuring a stress-free assessment process for candidates. The platform offers structured assessments, similar to Codility, providing a seamless transition from one test to another. On the other hand, Plum focuses on a more holistic assessment approach, considering not only skills but also personality traits and problem-solving abilities. It offers an engaging candidate experience by allowing them to learn more about their strengths and weaknesses, similar to HackerRank's developer-centric platform that goes beyond coding tests.
Sova Assessment
Plum
UX and Candidate Experience
Sova is designed with a user-friendly interface that aims to provide a seamless experience for candidates. The platform's streamlined process enables candidates to access, complete, and submit assessments with ease, reducing the stress associated with traditional assessment methods. Furthermore, the personalized feedback offered by Sova enhances the candidate experience by providing them with valuable insights into their performance. The platform is also mobile-friendly, which allows candidates to complete assessments at their convenience, thereby improving their overall experience.
Plum is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, ensuring a smooth experience for both companies and candidates. It offers a seamless candidate experience, with streamlined processes and clear instructions that make it easy for applicants to engage with the platform. The software is designed to reduce the complexity of the recruitment process, making it easier for businesses to identify top talent. In addition, Plum provides a fair and unbiased assessment process, leading to a positive experience for candidates.
Entry Price (August 2023)
Custom
Free Trial
Who is it for?
Companies in need of a solution to improve their candidate experience and improve their assessment operations
Supports hiring managers and companies that are looking for a scalable, top-of-funnel pre-employment assessment and/or hiring software application.
Key Market Segments
Enterprise
Mid-Market
G2 Review Rating (August 2023)
4.4
4.4
TrustPilot Review Rating (August 2023)
n/a
4.2
Number of G2 User Reviews
20
71
Ease of Use
8.7
8.8
Ease of Setup
8.8
9
Quality of Support
9.1
9
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
8.5
Pre-made Test Library and Test Customization
Sova Assessment does not provide a pre-made test library. However, it does offer customization options, allowing you to tailor assessments to suit your specific needs.
Plum does not provide a pre-made test library. However, it offers customization options to create assessments that match specific job requirements.
Assessment Categories
Assessment
Pre-employment Testing
Technical Screening
Video Interviewing
Diversity Recruiting
Pre-employment Testing
Talent Intelligence
Company Information
Sova
United Kingdom
sovaassessment.com/platform
Plum
Founded: 2012
Canada
plum.io
Save time and find talent that fits your team culture and role
Gyfted takes a modern, future of work approach to candidate assessments that is in stark contrast to traditional assessment industry practices. We do not just test candidates, we pride ourselves in matching them for role fit and cultural (values) fit.
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
At Gyfted we emphasize quality and outcomes. We prioritize the candidate experience first. We know that a positive one attracts top talent and leads to better matches over time. Our software is built around proven assessment standards and theories, offering a range of assessments from Personality testing (Big Five) to EQ to Abstract Reasoning, and above all testing for Team Cultural Add/Fit. We don't just aim to find a candidate who can do the job, but one who also aligns with the company's culture and values, and can seamlessly integrate into the existing team dynamics. We've aligned our business model with customers. Instead of charging per test or per candidate, we charge a monthly SaaS fee based on the organization size and package - our pricing is designed to give you value, not limit usage, and enable a great candidate experience.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.
Candidate-friendly Assessments for Culture-first Companies
Personality, EQ, Logical Reasoning, Culture Add, Values, Cognitive Styles, Work Styles, Motivational, Communication Styles, Conflict-Solving Style