Talent Screening and Assessment Software Guide
Plum vs SHL
View this side-by-side comparison of SHL vs Plum based on data from user reviews and publicly available information on Plum and SHL, to help you make the best choice for your recruitment needs.
Comparing SHL and Plum
When weighing up SHL and Plum, your decision will depend on your unique recruitment goals and the type of experience you want to give your applicants. SHL provides a robust and comprehensive range of psychometric tests, offering deep insights into candidate abilities. On the other hand, Plum leans towards a more holistic approach, utilizing both psychometric testing and artificial intelligence to predict job performance and cultural fit. Both offer valuable insights but differ in their approach to candidate assessment.
SHL is a renowned assessment software solution that aims to streamline the recruitment process by offering a range of psychometric tests, behavioral assessments, and skills tests. Its usefulness lies in its ability to provide detailed insights into a candidate's abilities and potential, aiding companies in making informed hiring decisions.
On the other hand, Plum is a predictive hiring tool that leverages artificial intelligence to predict the future success of potential employees. Its focus is on identifying candidates’ key strengths and growth areas through behavioral and problem-solving assessments. Its usefulness lies in its ability to reduce bias in hiring and increase the predictability of job performance, thereby helping companies to build stronger, more efficient teams.
Save Time Screening for Culture Add and Culture Fit
Assessment Vendor Features
Candidate Screening
Candidate Comparisons
Candidate Ranking
Talent Development
Customizable Tests
(depends on vendor)
Dashboard Reporting
Personality Testing
Cognitive Testing
Psychometrics
SHL and Plum ease of use and candidate experience
SHL provides a streamlined user experience with its well-organized interface and various assessment tools, offering candidates a seamless examination process. It emphasizes on the accuracy and fairness of assessments, ensuring a positive candidate experience. On the other hand, Plum focuses on providing a more holistic assessment approach, incorporating behavioral and cognitive aspects along with hard skills. Its platform is user-friendly and interactive, enhancing the overall candidate experience by providing personalized feedback and insights about their abilities and potential.
SHL
Plum
UX and Candidate Experience
SHL software product, established in 1995 in the United Kingdom, is renowned for its user-friendly interface and positive candidate experience. With its online portal, Talent Central, it offers a seamless experience for candidates by making the process of assessments smooth and efficient. Candidates appreciate the intuitive navigation and clear instructions, making it easy for them to understand the assessment process and expectations. The software's well-designed structure provides a convenient and straightforward experience, thus reducing potential test anxiety and ensuring candidates can perform at their best.
Plum is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, ensuring a smooth experience for both companies and candidates. It offers a seamless candidate experience, with streamlined processes and clear instructions that make it easy for applicants to engage with the platform. The software is designed to reduce the complexity of the recruitment process, making it easier for businesses to identify top talent. In addition, Plum provides a fair and unbiased assessment process, leading to a positive experience for candidates.
Entry Price (August 2023)
Custom
Free Trial
Who is it for?
Organizations interested in a powerful assessment portal
Supports hiring managers and companies that are looking for a scalable, top-of-funnel pre-employment assessment and/or hiring software application.
Key Market Segments
Mid-Market
Mid-Market
G2 Review Rating (August 2023)
4.5
4.4
TrustPilot Review Rating (August 2023)
2.8
4.2
Number of G2 User Reviews
1
71
Ease of Use
n/a
8.8
Ease of Setup
n/a
9
Quality of Support
n/a
9
Product Direction (% positive)
n/a
8.5
Pre-made Test Library and Test Customization
SHL provides a solid pre-made test library for its users. It also offers customization options to tailor assessments to specific job roles or competencies, ensuring relevancy to the job role.
Plum does not provide a pre-made test library. However, it offers customization options to create assessments that match specific job requirements.
Assessment Categories
Assessment
Talent Management
Diversity Recruiting
Pre-employment Testing
Talent Intelligence
Company Information
SHL
Founded: 1995
United Kingdom
www.shl.com/en/assessments/talent-central/
Plum
Founded: 2012
Canada
plum.io
Save time and find talent that fits your team culture and role
Gyfted takes a modern, future of work approach to candidate assessments that is in stark contrast to traditional assessment industry practices. We do not just test candidates, we pride ourselves in matching them for role fit and cultural (values) fit.
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
At Gyfted we emphasize quality and outcomes. We prioritize the candidate experience first. We know that a positive one attracts top talent and leads to better matches over time. Our software is built around proven assessment standards and theories, offering a range of assessments from Personality testing (Big Five) to EQ to Abstract Reasoning, and above all testing for Team Cultural Add/Fit. We don't just aim to find a candidate who can do the job, but one who also aligns with the company's culture and values, and can seamlessly integrate into the existing team dynamics. We've aligned our business model with customers. Instead of charging per test or per candidate, we charge a monthly SaaS fee based on the organization size and package - our pricing is designed to give you value, not limit usage, and enable a great candidate experience.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.
Candidate-friendly Assessments for Culture-first Companies
Personality, EQ, Logical Reasoning, Culture Add, Values, Cognitive Styles, Work Styles, Motivational, Communication Styles, Conflict-Solving Style