Talent Screening and Assessment Software Guide
HireScore vs Plum
View this side-by-side comparison of Plum vs HireScore based on data from user reviews and publicly available information on HireScore and Plum, to help you make the best choice for your recruitment needs.
Comparing Plum and HireScore
Deciding between Plum and HireScore hinges on your unique hiring requirements and the type of experience you wish to extend to your potential hires. Plum provides a thorough, science-backed approach, focusing on psychometric and problem-solving skills assessments. On the other hand, HireScore offers a more comprehensive, candidate-centric platform, with a strong emphasis on job fit and behavioral assessments.
Plum is a software solution designed to optimize the hiring process by predicting the success of potential candidates. It uses advanced psychometric assessments to examine various attributes like adaptability, innovation, and communication. This software aims to provide valuable insights that can guide hiring decisions, making it a useful tool for companies looking to hire the right people for their team.
On the other hand, HireScore is a software solution that focuses on providing a comprehensive evaluation of candidates by assessing their skills, knowledge, and potential for job fit. Its primary aim is to reduce hiring time and increase the quality of hires. HireScore's strength lies in its ability to deliver objective and reliable data about applicants, making it a useful tool for companies to make informed hiring decisions.
Save Time Screening for Culture Add and Culture Fit
Assessment Vendor Features
Candidate Screening
Candidate Comparisons
Candidate Ranking
Talent Development
Customizable Tests
(depends on vendor)
Dashboard Reporting
Personality Testing
Cognitive Testing
Psychometrics
Plum and HireScore ease of use and candidate experience
Plum provides a comprehensive user experience with a blend of behavioral and cognitive data to predict job success and ensure a positive candidate experience. It employs a user-friendly interface which is easy to navigate, helping candidates to comfortably complete the assessments. HireScore, on the other hand, offers a holistic approach to talent assessment with in-depth profiling that goes beyond skill and experience. It provides a seamless experience for the users enabling them to easily understand and complete the assessments. However, unlike Plum, HireScore doesn't heavily integrate cognitive data in its assessments.
Plum
HireScore
UX and Candidate Experience
Plum is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, ensuring a smooth experience for both companies and candidates. It offers a seamless candidate experience, with streamlined processes and clear instructions that make it easy for applicants to engage with the platform. The software is designed to reduce the complexity of the recruitment process, making it easier for businesses to identify top talent. In addition, Plum provides a fair and unbiased assessment process, leading to a positive experience for candidates.
Stang Decision Systems, operating through their platform HireScore.com, offers a user-friendly and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to navigate and utilize its features efficiently. The platform is designed to enhance the candidate experience, providing streamlined application processes, timely feedback and transparent communication. With a focus on reducing hiring time and improving the quality of hire, the software combines assessment science, data analytics, and digital technology to ensure an effective and efficient experience for both candidates and recruiters.
Entry Price (August 2023)
Free Trial
$600.00/month
Who is it for?
Supports hiring managers and companies that are looking for a scalable, top-of-funnel pre-employment assessment and/or hiring software application.
Organizations who want to have the most accurate hiring process in the world.
Key Market Segments
Mid-Market
Mid-Market
G2 Review Rating (August 2023)
4.4
n/a
TrustPilot Review Rating (August 2023)
4.2
n/a
Number of G2 User Reviews
71
n/a
Ease of Use
8.8
n/a
Ease of Setup
9
n/a
Quality of Support
9
n/a
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
n/a
Pre-made Test Library and Test Customization
Plum does not provide a pre-made test library. However, it offers customization options to create assessments that match specific job requirements.
HireScore does not provide a pre-made test library. However, it offers the option to create customized assessments based on job-specific competencies.
Assessment Categories
Diversity Recruiting
Pre-employment Testing
Talent Intelligence
Applicant Tracking
Onboarding
Pre-employment Testing
Recruiting
Company Information
Plum
Founded: 2012
Canada
plum.io
Stang Decision Systems
Founded: 2001
United States
hirescore.com
Save time and find talent that fits your team culture and role
Gyfted takes a modern, future of work approach to candidate assessments that is in stark contrast to traditional assessment industry practices. We do not just test candidates, we pride ourselves in matching them for role fit and cultural (values) fit.
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
At Gyfted we emphasize quality and outcomes. We prioritize the candidate experience first. We know that a positive one attracts top talent and leads to better matches over time. Our software is built around proven assessment standards and theories, offering a range of assessments from Personality testing (Big Five) to EQ to Abstract Reasoning, and above all testing for Team Cultural Add/Fit. We don't just aim to find a candidate who can do the job, but one who also aligns with the company's culture and values, and can seamlessly integrate into the existing team dynamics. We've aligned our business model with customers. Instead of charging per test or per candidate, we charge a monthly SaaS fee based on the organization size and package - our pricing is designed to give you value, not limit usage, and enable a great candidate experience.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.
Candidate-friendly Assessments for Culture-first Companies
Personality, EQ, Logical Reasoning, Culture Add, Values, Cognitive Styles, Work Styles, Motivational, Communication Styles, Conflict-Solving Style