Talent Screening and Assessment Software Guide
Alva Labs vs Plum
View this side-by-side comparison of Plum vs Alva Labs based on data from user reviews and publicly available information on Alva Labs and Plum, to help you make the best choice for your recruitment needs.
Comparing Plum and Alva Labs
When deciding between the assessment software solutions Plum and Alva Labs, your choice will rely heavily on your specific needs and the experience you wish to give your candidates. Plum provides a more comprehensive approach, focusing on psychometric and problem-solving assessments, which helps in predicting the job performance. On the other hand, Alva Labs offers a more user-friendly platform that integrates both personality and cognitive ability tests, providing more holistic insights into the candidate’s potential.
Plum, much like Codility, is a cloud-based hiring solution that focuses on evaluating a candidate's potential and predicting job success. It uses advanced industrial-organizational psychology to profile candidates, providing a comprehensive understanding of their strengths and areas for development. This makes the hiring process more efficient and increases the likelihood of successful placements.
On the other hand, Alva Labs, similar to HackerRank, utilizes psychometric testing and data science to assess the soft skills of candidates. It offers a robust platform that measures personality traits and problem-solving abilities, providing companies with a comprehensive evaluation of potential employees. This enables companies to make data-driven decisions in their hiring process, ensuring the right fit for their teams.
Save Time Screening for Culture Add and Culture Fit
Assessment Vendor Features
Candidate Screening
Candidate Comparisons
Candidate Ranking
Talent Development
Customizable Tests
(depends on vendor)
Dashboard Reporting
Personality Testing
Cognitive Testing
Psychometrics
Plum and Alva Labs ease of use and candidate experience
Plum offers a user-friendly experience, focusing on providing a comprehensive understanding of a candidate's strengths and potential through scientifically-backed assessments. It provides a smooth testing experience, emphasizing on quantifying human potential and matching it to job requirements. On the other hand, Alva Labs delivers a candidate-centric approach, offering psychometric tests that are fast, fair, and based on scientific research. It allows candidates to receive feedback, ensuring a transparent and engaging assessment process. Both platforms aim to provide a seamless UX and positive candidate experience, though their approach and areas of focus differ.
Plum
Alva Labs
UX and Candidate Experience
Plum is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, ensuring a smooth experience for both companies and candidates. It offers a seamless candidate experience, with streamlined processes and clear instructions that make it easy for applicants to engage with the platform. The software is designed to reduce the complexity of the recruitment process, making it easier for businesses to identify top talent. In addition, Plum provides a fair and unbiased assessment process, leading to a positive experience for candidates.
Alva Labs is a software product designed with a clear emphasis on ease of use and enhancing candidate experience. Founded in Sweden in 2017, this software utilizes a user-friendly interface that allows recruiting teams to evaluate candidates efficiently. It streamlines the recruitment process, offering a seamless experience for candidates as they undergo assessments and interviews. In addition, its advanced, scientifically-backed tools provide valuable insights into a candidate's fit for a role, promoting transparency and fairness in hiring decisions. Overall, Alva Labs optimizes the recruitment journey for both the hiring team and candidates.
Entry Price (August 2023)
Free Trial
Free Trial
Who is it for?
Supports hiring managers and companies that are looking for a scalable, top-of-funnel pre-employment assessment and/or hiring software application.
Recruiting platform that helps companies
Key Market Segments
Mid-Market
Mid-Market
G2 Review Rating (August 2023)
4.4
4.9
TrustPilot Review Rating (August 2023)
4.2
4.2
Number of G2 User Reviews
71
55
Ease of Use
8.8
9.2
Ease of Setup
9
9.2
Quality of Support
9
9.5
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
9.1
Pre-made Test Library and Test Customization
Plum does not provide a pre-made test library. However, it offers customization options to create assessments that match specific job requirements.
Alva Labs does provide a small pre-made test library, covering areas such as logical reasoning, personality, and cognitive ability. However, little customization of these tests is possible.
Assessment Categories
Diversity Recruiting
Pre-employment Testing
Talent Intelligence
Pre-employment Testing
Recruiting
Assessment
Company Information
Plum
Founded: 2012
Canada
plum.io
Alva Labs
Founded: 2017
Sweden
www.alvalabs.io
Save time and find talent that fits your team culture and role
Gyfted takes a modern, future of work approach to candidate assessments that is in stark contrast to traditional assessment industry practices. We do not just test candidates, we pride ourselves in matching them for role fit and cultural (values) fit.
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
At Gyfted we emphasize quality and outcomes. We prioritize the candidate experience first. We know that a positive one attracts top talent and leads to better matches over time. Our software is built around proven assessment standards and theories, offering a range of assessments from Personality testing (Big Five) to EQ to Abstract Reasoning, and above all testing for Team Cultural Add/Fit. We don't just aim to find a candidate who can do the job, but one who also aligns with the company's culture and values, and can seamlessly integrate into the existing team dynamics. We've aligned our business model with customers. Instead of charging per test or per candidate, we charge a monthly SaaS fee based on the organization size and package - our pricing is designed to give you value, not limit usage, and enable a great candidate experience.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.
Candidate-friendly Assessments for Culture-first Companies
Personality, EQ, Logical Reasoning, Culture Add, Values, Cognitive Styles, Work Styles, Motivational, Communication Styles, Conflict-Solving Style