Talent Screening and Assessment Software Guide
Harver vs Paradox
View this side-by-side comparison of Paradox vs Harver based on data from user reviews and publicly available information on Harver and Paradox, to help you make the best choice for your recruitment needs.
Comparing Paradox and Harver
Deciding between Paradox and Harver relies on your specific hiring requirements and the experience you aim to provide for your applicants. Paradox puts an emphasis on AI-driven automation, providing a seamless and efficient recruitment process. On the other hand, Harver offers a more comprehensive, candidate-centric platform, focusing on providing a fair and engaging selection process.
Paradox is a software solution designed to streamline the recruitment process using artificial intelligence. It's known for its AI assistant, Olivia, who automates administrative tasks such as interview scheduling and candidate screening, thus saving recruiters significant time. This allows recruiters to focus on more high-value activities, such as relationship building and strategy.
Harver, on the other hand, is a pre-employment assessment software that aims to digitize the recruitment process. It offers a wide variety of tailor-made assessments that evaluate candidates on their skills and job fit. This data-driven approach helps companies make objective hiring decisions and improves the candidate experience by providing a clear view of the job requirements. Both software solutions aim to improve the efficiency of the recruitment process, but they do so in different ways and offer unique benefits.
Save Time Screening for Culture Add and Culture Fit
Assessment Vendor Features
Candidate Screening
Candidate Comparisons
Candidate Ranking
Talent Development
Customizable Tests
(depends on vendor)
Dashboard Reporting
Personality Testing
Cognitive Testing
Psychometrics
Paradox and Harver ease of use and candidate experience
Paradox is known for its intuitive user experience, providing a seamless interface that easily guides candidates through assessments. The user-friendly features of this platform make the assessment process straightforward and stress-free. On the other hand, Harver offers a more immersive candidate experience. It not only provides structured assessments, but also includes realistic job previews and situational judgement tests, which allow candidates to fully understand and engage with the role they are applying for. While both platforms are effective, Paradox may be more suitable for businesses looking for a simple, straightforward solution, while Harver may be preferred by those looking to provide a more comprehensive, engaging candidate experience.
Paradox
Harver
UX and Candidate Experience
Paradox is renowned for its user-friendly interface, offering a seamless UX that enhances the overall candidate experience. The platform is designed to be intuitive, making it easy for users to navigate through different features and functionalities. It uses AI to improve recruitment processes, providing quick and efficient communication that candidates appreciate. Paradox's ease of use and interactive features provide a superior user experience, making the recruitment process smoother and more efficient for both candidates and recruiters.
Harver is a pre-employment assessment software designed to streamline the hiring process and improve candidate experience. Its intuitive user interface is known for its ease of use, allowing both employers and candidates to navigate the platform effortlessly. Candidates appreciate the engaging, interactive assessments and the transparent communication throughout the hiring process. The platform's automation and AI capabilities further enhance the user experience by speeding up processes and providing insightful data. Overall, Harver provides a seamless, user-friendly experience for everyone involved in the hiring process.
Entry Price (August 2023)
Custom
Custom
Who is it for?
HR and TA leaders
Harver is the only purpose-built volume hiring solution enabling companies to hire digital and fair.
Key Market Segments
Enterprise
Enterprise
G2 Review Rating (August 2023)
4.6
4.6
TrustPilot Review Rating (August 2023)
3.2
n/a
Number of G2 User Reviews
34
162
Ease of Use
9.3
9.1
Ease of Setup
8.4
9
Quality of Support
9.4
9.1
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
8.8
Pre-made Test Library and Test Customization
Paradox does not provide a pre-made test library. However, it allows customization according to the company’s needs.
Harver does provide a pre-made test library, offering a wide variety of assessments to measure different skills. Additionally, it also allows customization where employers can tailor the assessments to match the specific needs of their companies.
Assessment Categories
Pre-employment Testing
Recruiting
Assessment
Diversity Recruiting
Pre-employment Testing
Recruiting
Talent Intelligence
Company Information
Paradox
United States
Harver
Founded: 2013
United States
harver.com
Save time and find talent that fits your team culture and role
Gyfted takes a modern, future of work approach to candidate assessments that is in stark contrast to traditional assessment industry practices. We do not just test candidates, we pride ourselves in matching them for role fit and cultural (values) fit.
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
At Gyfted we emphasize quality and outcomes. We prioritize the candidate experience first. We know that a positive one attracts top talent and leads to better matches over time. Our software is built around proven assessment standards and theories, offering a range of assessments from Personality testing (Big Five) to EQ to Abstract Reasoning, and above all testing for Team Cultural Add/Fit. We don't just aim to find a candidate who can do the job, but one who also aligns with the company's culture and values, and can seamlessly integrate into the existing team dynamics. We've aligned our business model with customers. Instead of charging per test or per candidate, we charge a monthly SaaS fee based on the organization size and package - our pricing is designed to give you value, not limit usage, and enable a great candidate experience.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.
Candidate-friendly Assessments for Culture-first Companies
Personality, EQ, Logical Reasoning, Culture Add, Values, Cognitive Styles, Work Styles, Motivational, Communication Styles, Conflict-Solving Style