Talent Screening and Assessment Software Guide
HireScore vs McQuaig
View this side-by-side comparison of McQuaig vs HireScore based on data from user reviews and publicly available information on HireScore and McQuaig, to help you make the best choice for your recruitment needs.
Comparing McQuaig and HireScore
Deciding between McQuaig and HireScore depends on your exact assessment requirements and the type of experience you wish to offer to potential hires. McQuaig provides a robust psychological profiling system that offers deep insights into candidate behavior and personality traits. On the other hand, HireScore presents a comprehensive talent assessment platform that focuses on candidate skills, potential, and fit for the role. The choice between the two comes down to whether you prefer a more psychology-based approach or a more skills-based strategy for candidate assessment.
McQuaig and HireScore are both assessment software solutions designed to streamline the recruitment process. McQuaig aims to provide a comprehensive profiling system, aiding companies in identifying the personality traits and capabilities of potential candidates. It is known for its reliable psychometric testing and in-depth reports, helping recruiters make informed decisions about hiring and team building. On the other hand, HireScore focuses on delivering a data-driven hiring process. It seeks to assess candidates based on their skills, knowledge, and job compatibility. The platform is appreciated for its custom assessment creation and performance tracking features, assisting companies in finding the best fit for each role. Both are useful tools, but their focus differs slightly, with McQuaig concentrating on personality profiling and HireScore on skill assessment.
Save Time Screening for Culture Add and Culture Fit
Assessment Vendor Features
Candidate Screening
Candidate Comparisons
Candidate Ranking
Talent Development
Customizable Tests
(depends on vendor)
Dashboard Reporting
Personality Testing
Cognitive Testing
Psychometrics
McQuaig and HireScore ease of use and candidate experience
McQuaig offers an intuitive UX, focusing on user-friendly psychometric assessments for candidates. It provides a seamless user experience, allowing candidates to easily navigate through the testing process. On the other hand, HireScore places emphasis on a comprehensive candidate experience. It not only facilitates testing but also offers candidates resources for career development and feedback on their performance. This makes HireScore a more interactive platform, similar to HackerRank's approach, while McQuaig offers a straightforward, user-centric experience akin to Codility.
McQuaig
HireScore
UX and Candidate Experience
McQuaig software offers a user-friendly and intuitive interface that simplifies the recruitment process for both recruiters and candidates. The platform is designed with optimal UX in mind, providing a seamless navigation experience with clearly labeled tabs and easy-to-follow instructions. Candidates find the experience engaging and straightforward, as the software provides timely updates and feedback, ensuring transparency throughout the recruitment process. Therefore, the ease of use, well-curated user experience and positive candidate experience makes McQuaig a preferred choice for many organizations.
Stang Decision Systems, operating through their platform HireScore.com, offers a user-friendly and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to navigate and utilize its features efficiently. The platform is designed to enhance the candidate experience, providing streamlined application processes, timely feedback and transparent communication. With a focus on reducing hiring time and improving the quality of hire, the software combines assessment science, data analytics, and digital technology to ensure an effective and efficient experience for both candidates and recruiters.
Entry Price (August 2023)
Custom
$600.00/month
Who is it for?
HR and TA leaders
Organizations who want to have the most accurate hiring process in the world.
Key Market Segments
Small-Business
Mid-Market
G2 Review Rating (August 2023)
3.5
n/a
TrustPilot Review Rating (August 2023)
n/a
n/a
Number of G2 User Reviews
1
n/a
Ease of Use
n/a
n/a
Ease of Setup
n/a
n/a
Quality of Support
n/a
n/a
Product Direction (% positive)
n/a
n/a
Pre-made Test Library and Test Customization
McQuaig provides a pre-made test library. It also offers customization features to allow tailoring the assessments to specific job roles or competencies.
HireScore does not provide a pre-made test library. However, it offers the option to create customized assessments based on job-specific competencies.
Assessment Categories
Pre-employment Testing
Recruiting
Applicant Tracking
Onboarding
Pre-employment Testing
Recruiting
Company Information
McQuaig
United States
Stang Decision Systems
Founded: 2001
United States
hirescore.com
Save time and find talent that fits your team culture and role
Gyfted takes a modern, future of work approach to candidate assessments that is in stark contrast to traditional assessment industry practices. We do not just test candidates, we pride ourselves in matching them for role fit and cultural (values) fit.
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
At Gyfted we emphasize quality and outcomes. We prioritize the candidate experience first. We know that a positive one attracts top talent and leads to better matches over time. Our software is built around proven assessment standards and theories, offering a range of assessments from Personality testing (Big Five) to EQ to Abstract Reasoning, and above all testing for Team Cultural Add/Fit. We don't just aim to find a candidate who can do the job, but one who also aligns with the company's culture and values, and can seamlessly integrate into the existing team dynamics. We've aligned our business model with customers. Instead of charging per test or per candidate, we charge a monthly SaaS fee based on the organization size and package - our pricing is designed to give you value, not limit usage, and enable a great candidate experience.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.
Candidate-friendly Assessments for Culture-first Companies
Personality, EQ, Logical Reasoning, Culture Add, Values, Cognitive Styles, Work Styles, Motivational, Communication Styles, Conflict-Solving Style