Talent Screening and Assessment Software Guide
Gallup vs Plum
View this side-by-side comparison of Plum vs Gallup based on data from user reviews and publicly available information on Gallup and Plum, to help you make the best choice for your recruitment needs.
Comparing Plum and Gallup
When comparing Plum and Gallup, your choice depends on your specific hiring requirements and the kind of user experience you want to offer. Plum excels in using AI to predict hiring success and provides a more personalized approach for candidate assessment, focusing on their individual potential and future fitness for the job. On the other hand, Gallup, with its CliftonStrengths assessment, offers a more comprehensive tool, emphasizing the strengths of the candidates and helping companies to leverage these strengths for their benefit.
Plum is a software solution aimed at enhancing talent acquisition and retention by predicting the success and potential of individuals in specific roles. It provides scientifically backed assessments to measure the inherent abilities of candidates, thereby assisting organizations in making informed hiring and development decisions. On the other hand, Gallup is a renowned management consulting firm that provides analytics and advice to help leaders and organizations solve their most pressing problems. Their CliftonStrengths assessment is particularly noteworthy for identifying the natural talents of individuals, helping organizations to place them in roles where they can leverage their strengths. While Plum focuses on predicting potential and success, Gallup concentrates on identifying and nurturing existing strengths. Both are useful in their respective areas, aiding companies in optimizing their talent management strategies.
Save Time Screening for Culture Add and Culture Fit
Assessment Vendor Features
Candidate Screening
Candidate Comparisons
Candidate Ranking
Talent Development
Customizable Tests
(depends on vendor)
Dashboard Reporting
Personality Testing
Cognitive Testing
Psychometrics
Plum and Gallup ease of use and candidate experience
Plum provides a user-centric assessment experience that uses AI to predict job performance and cultural fit. It offers a straightforward interface, ensuring a smooth experience for both candidates and HR professionals. On the other hand, Gallup offers a more holistic approach to assessment, focusing on enhancing individual and team performance. While it provides an intuitive user experience, its strength lies in its comprehensive reporting and expert analysis. Unlike Plum, Gallup also offers a range of additional resources to support candidate development and organizational growth.
Plum
Gallup
UX and Candidate Experience
Plum is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, ensuring a smooth experience for both companies and candidates. It offers a seamless candidate experience, with streamlined processes and clear instructions that make it easy for applicants to engage with the platform. The software is designed to reduce the complexity of the recruitment process, making it easier for businesses to identify top talent. In addition, Plum provides a fair and unbiased assessment process, leading to a positive experience for candidates.
Gallup Access is designed to be user-friendly and intuitive, making it easy for users to navigate and use its features without requiring extensive technical knowledge. It offers a streamlined candidate experience, with a comprehensive dashboard that provides real-time feedback and actionable insights. The platform allows for seamless communication, personalized learning, and easy access to a wealth of resources, ensuring a smooth and efficient user experience. Its interface is clean and easy to understand, reducing the learning curve and allowing users to utilize its functionalities to the maximum.
Entry Price (August 2023)
Free Trial
$45/test
Who is it for?
Supports hiring managers and companies that are looking for a scalable, top-of-funnel pre-employment assessment and/or hiring software application.
Organizations and companies requiring a solution providing information and tools to improve their workplace
Key Market Segments
Mid-Market
Mid-Market
G2 Review Rating (August 2023)
4.4
4.5
TrustPilot Review Rating (August 2023)
4.2
2.9
Number of G2 User Reviews
71
6
Ease of Use
8.8
9
Ease of Setup
9
n/a
Quality of Support
9
n/a
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
n/a
Pre-made Test Library and Test Customization
Plum does not provide a pre-made test library. However, it offers customization options to create assessments that match specific job requirements.
Gallup does not provide a pre-made test library. It specializes in creating custom assessments tailored to specific job roles and competencies.
Assessment Categories
Diversity Recruiting
Pre-employment Testing
Talent Intelligence
Employee Engagement
Employee Survey
Company Information
Plum
Founded: 2012
Canada
plum.io
Gallup Access
United States
www.gallup.com/access/
Save time and find talent that fits your team culture and role
Gyfted takes a modern, future of work approach to candidate assessments that is in stark contrast to traditional assessment industry practices. We do not just test candidates, we pride ourselves in matching them for role fit and cultural (values) fit.
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
At Gyfted we emphasize quality and outcomes. We prioritize the candidate experience first. We know that a positive one attracts top talent and leads to better matches over time. Our software is built around proven assessment standards and theories, offering a range of assessments from Personality testing (Big Five) to EQ to Abstract Reasoning, and above all testing for Team Cultural Add/Fit. We don't just aim to find a candidate who can do the job, but one who also aligns with the company's culture and values, and can seamlessly integrate into the existing team dynamics. We've aligned our business model with customers. Instead of charging per test or per candidate, we charge a monthly SaaS fee based on the organization size and package - our pricing is designed to give you value, not limit usage, and enable a great candidate experience.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.
Candidate-friendly Assessments for Culture-first Companies
Personality, EQ, Logical Reasoning, Culture Add, Values, Cognitive Styles, Work Styles, Motivational, Communication Styles, Conflict-Solving Style