Talent Screening and Assessment Software Guide
Plum vs Paradox
View this side-by-side comparison of Paradox vs Plum based on data from user reviews and publicly available information on Plum and Paradox, to help you make the best choice for your recruitment needs.
Comparing Paradox and Plum
Selecting between Paradox and Plum relies on your unique evaluation needs and the type of interaction you wish to offer to your candidates. Paradox provides a user-friendly, AI-driven platform designed to streamline the recruitment process, whereas Plum offers a more comprehensive, scientifically-backed approach to talent evaluation, focusing on gauging the potential and predicting the success of the candidates.
Paradox is an artificial intelligence (AI) solution designed to automate and simplify the recruitment process. Its aim is to improve the hiring experience for both recruiters and candidates by using AI to handle time-consuming tasks such as screening, scheduling, and communication. The value of Paradox lies in its ability to significantly reduce the time and effort required for recruitment, allowing companies to focus more on strategy and candidate engagement.
Plum, on the other hand, is a talent assessment platform that uses predictive analytics to help companies hire, grow, and retain top talent. Its main objective is to provide data-driven insights into candidates' potential and fit for a role, beyond what can be gleaned from resumes and interviews alone. The usefulness of Plum comes from its ability to mitigate hiring risks and improve the quality of hires by providing a more accurate and comprehensive view of a candidate's capabilities and potential.
Save Time Screening for Culture Add and Culture Fit
Assessment Vendor Features
Candidate Screening
Candidate Comparisons
Candidate Ranking
Talent Development
Customizable Tests
(depends on vendor)
Dashboard Reporting
Personality Testing
Cognitive Testing
Psychometrics
Paradox and Plum ease of use and candidate experience
Paradox offers an AI-driven assessment software solution that emphasizes a seamless user experience, using natural language processing to interact with candidates in a human-like manner. It provides a straightforward interface, enabling smooth navigation and user-friendly applications. On the other hand, Plum's platform focuses on providing a comprehensive understanding of candidates' abilities and potential, leveraging psychometric data and predictive analytics. It offers a more in-depth candidate experience by focusing on extracting multifaceted insights rather than just skill-based assessments.
Paradox
Plum
UX and Candidate Experience
Paradox is renowned for its user-friendly interface, offering a seamless UX that enhances the overall candidate experience. The platform is designed to be intuitive, making it easy for users to navigate through different features and functionalities. It uses AI to improve recruitment processes, providing quick and efficient communication that candidates appreciate. Paradox's ease of use and interactive features provide a superior user experience, making the recruitment process smoother and more efficient for both candidates and recruiters.
Plum is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, ensuring a smooth experience for both companies and candidates. It offers a seamless candidate experience, with streamlined processes and clear instructions that make it easy for applicants to engage with the platform. The software is designed to reduce the complexity of the recruitment process, making it easier for businesses to identify top talent. In addition, Plum provides a fair and unbiased assessment process, leading to a positive experience for candidates.
Entry Price (August 2023)
Custom
Free Trial
Who is it for?
HR and TA leaders
Supports hiring managers and companies that are looking for a scalable, top-of-funnel pre-employment assessment and/or hiring software application.
Key Market Segments
Enterprise
Mid-Market
G2 Review Rating (August 2023)
4.6
4.4
TrustPilot Review Rating (August 2023)
3.2
4.2
Number of G2 User Reviews
34
71
Ease of Use
9.3
8.8
Ease of Setup
8.4
9
Quality of Support
9.4
9
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
8.5
Pre-made Test Library and Test Customization
Paradox does not provide a pre-made test library. However, it allows customization according to the company’s needs.
Plum does not provide a pre-made test library. However, it offers customization options to create assessments that match specific job requirements.
Assessment Categories
Pre-employment Testing
Recruiting
Diversity Recruiting
Pre-employment Testing
Talent Intelligence
Company Information
Paradox
United States
Plum
Founded: 2012
Canada
plum.io
Save time and find talent that fits your team culture and role
Gyfted takes a modern, future of work approach to candidate assessments that is in stark contrast to traditional assessment industry practices. We do not just test candidates, we pride ourselves in matching them for role fit and cultural (values) fit.
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
At Gyfted we emphasize quality and outcomes. We prioritize the candidate experience first. We know that a positive one attracts top talent and leads to better matches over time. Our software is built around proven assessment standards and theories, offering a range of assessments from Personality testing (Big Five) to EQ to Abstract Reasoning, and above all testing for Team Cultural Add/Fit. We don't just aim to find a candidate who can do the job, but one who also aligns with the company's culture and values, and can seamlessly integrate into the existing team dynamics. We've aligned our business model with customers. Instead of charging per test or per candidate, we charge a monthly SaaS fee based on the organization size and package - our pricing is designed to give you value, not limit usage, and enable a great candidate experience.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.
Candidate-friendly Assessments for Culture-first Companies
Personality, EQ, Logical Reasoning, Culture Add, Values, Cognitive Styles, Work Styles, Motivational, Communication Styles, Conflict-Solving Style