Talent Screening and Assessment Software Guide
Plum vs IBM Kenexa
View this side-by-side comparison of IBM Kenexa vs Plum based on data from user reviews and publicly available information on Plum and IBM Kenexa, to help you make the best choice for your recruitment needs.
Comparing IBM Kenexa and Plum
Choosing between IBM Kenexa and Plum largely depends on your specific hiring requirements and the kind of experience you wish to offer to your applicants. IBM Kenexa offers a robust, data-driven approach to talent management and assessment, making it an excellent tool for businesses that value analytics and precise candidate evaluation. On the other hand, Plum provides a more holistic, behavior-focused assessment solution, geared towards identifying key traits and potential in candidates, making it an ideal choice for companies wanting to focus on individual characteristics and potential.
IBM Kenexa and Plum are both effective assessment software solutions with distinct aims and advantages. IBM Kenexa focuses on talent acquisition and employee performance, offering tools for recruitment, onboarding, and employee assessment. Its strength lies in its ability to provide comprehensive talent insights that can help companies make informed hiring and promotion decisions. On the other hand, Plum aims to predict the success of a potential hire based on their talents and potentials, utilizing psychometric data and advanced predictive analytics. Its unique selling point is its capability to match individual's inherent abilities to job requirements, enabling companies to maximize employee productivity and improve retention rates.
Save Time Screening for Culture Add and Culture Fit
Assessment Vendor Features
Candidate Screening
Candidate Comparisons
Candidate Ranking
Talent Development
Customizable Tests
(depends on vendor)
Dashboard Reporting
Personality Testing
Cognitive Testing
Psychometrics
IBM Kenexa and Plum ease of use and candidate experience
IBM Kenexa and Plum both offer comprehensive assessment software solutions, but differ in their approach to UX and candidate experience. IBM Kenexa focuses on creating a tailored user experience, providing robust, customizable assessments that can integrate seamlessly with various HR systems. It offers a professional and straightforward testing environment for candidates. On the other hand, Plum emphasizes a more intuitive and engaging user experience. Its AI-driven platform provides personalized insights and recommendations, enhancing the candidate experience by making the assessment process more interactive and less stressful.
IBM Kenexa
Plum
UX and Candidate Experience
IBM Kenexa is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, providing a seamless user experience (UX) that makes it easy for recruiters and HR professionals to navigate. The platform's ease of use extends to candidates as well, offering a straightforward application process and clear communication tools that enhance the candidate experience. Its robust features are designed with user convenience in mind, making it easier to manage talent acquisition, employee assessment, and other HR tasks.
Plum is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, ensuring a smooth experience for both companies and candidates. It offers a seamless candidate experience, with streamlined processes and clear instructions that make it easy for applicants to engage with the platform. The software is designed to reduce the complexity of the recruitment process, making it easier for businesses to identify top talent. In addition, Plum provides a fair and unbiased assessment process, leading to a positive experience for candidates.
Entry Price (August 2023)
Custom
Free Trial
Who is it for?
HR, recruitment, and TA leaders at Enterprises
Supports hiring managers and companies that are looking for a scalable, top-of-funnel pre-employment assessment and/or hiring software application.
Key Market Segments
Enterprise
Mid-Market
G2 Review Rating (August 2023)
3.4
4.4
TrustPilot Review Rating (August 2023)
n/a
4.2
Number of G2 User Reviews
66
71
Ease of Use
7.3
8.8
Ease of Setup
5.8
9
Quality of Support
6.3
9
Product Direction (% positive)
5.1
8.5
Pre-made Test Library and Test Customization
IBM Kenexa offers a robust pre-made test library to its users. However, customization options are limited, as the focus is primarily on the pre-designed assessments.
Plum does not provide a pre-made test library. However, it offers customization options to create assessments that match specific job requirements.
Assessment Categories
Assessment
Pre-employment Testing
Skills
Technical Screening
Talent Development
Diversity Recruiting
Pre-employment Testing
Talent Intelligence
Company Information
IBM Kenexa
United States
Plum
Founded: 2012
Canada
plum.io
Save time and find talent that fits your team culture and role
Gyfted takes a modern, future of work approach to candidate assessments that is in stark contrast to traditional assessment industry practices. We do not just test candidates, we pride ourselves in matching them for role fit and cultural (values) fit.
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
At Gyfted we emphasize quality and outcomes. We prioritize the candidate experience first. We know that a positive one attracts top talent and leads to better matches over time. Our software is built around proven assessment standards and theories, offering a range of assessments from Personality testing (Big Five) to EQ to Abstract Reasoning, and above all testing for Team Cultural Add/Fit. We don't just aim to find a candidate who can do the job, but one who also aligns with the company's culture and values, and can seamlessly integrate into the existing team dynamics. We've aligned our business model with customers. Instead of charging per test or per candidate, we charge a monthly SaaS fee based on the organization size and package - our pricing is designed to give you value, not limit usage, and enable a great candidate experience.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.
Candidate-friendly Assessments for Culture-first Companies
Personality, EQ, Logical Reasoning, Culture Add, Values, Cognitive Styles, Work Styles, Motivational, Communication Styles, Conflict-Solving Style